Bastien wrote:
> Christopher Schmidt <> writes:
>> Nicolas Goaziou <> writes:
>>> Igor Sosa Mayor <> writes:
>>>> Thanks Nicolas. At least, I dont feel alone anymore... Is there any
>>>> chance this getting fixed somehow? I used to use it very often in my
>>>> emails and I miss it.
>>> I miss it, too.
>>> I didn't follow recent changes to orgstruct-mode, so I cannot help
>>> here.  I hope that someone more knowledgeable than I am will jump in.
>> orgstruct(++)-mode used to set auto-fill-function to
>> 'org-auto-fill-function.  This behaviour is too intrusive so we removed
>> it.  You either need to indent secondary lines by hand or set
>> auto-fill-function back to org-auto-fill-function.
> I don't remember why it was too intrusive, it worked fine for me.
>> orgstruct++'s hijacker of org-insert-heading-respect-content did not
>> respect item bodies.  I fixed this in master a few minutes ago.
> I just tried with orgstruct-mode and I still have the problem.
> With orgstruct++-mode, M-RET on the second line of an item inserts an
> item correctly, but there is another problem (also for orgstruct-mode):
> M-RET on the first line of a two-lines item will insert the new item in
> the middle of the item...
> Thanks for taking care of this!

I also have the problems that, when writing itemized lists in emails, the
minor mode takes the "- " as a line prefix, and does repeat it over each line,
something such as:

- this is a long, long, long, long, long, long, long, long, long, really long,
- very long item.
^ This one has been inserted automatically, unlike the behavior we had before.

Best regards,

Sebastien Vauban

Reply via email to