On 2015-01-23, at 10:56, Karl Voit <devn...@karl-voit.at> wrote: > I don't like proprietary software. I promote open solutions wherever > I can and accept a more painful living by ignoring comfy proprietary > solutions.
+1, the same with me. Although I do use some non-free-as-defined-by-FSF software. (Apparently, to be fully FSF-compliant you shouldn't say "open". Assuming that you *want* to be FSF-compliant, that is;-). BTW: from now on I'm going to use the terms: "free-as-defined-by-FSF" and its negation, because I do not want to borrow terms from an entity whose philosophy I do oppose.) > However, I do like to see (maintained) alternatives of MobileOrg and > I do like to see third party tools using the Org syntax for storing > and managing information. +1 > So: Jose, I like what I see on your web page and please do carry on. ^^^^ Neven, not Jose! > Thanks you for making it clear that your software is not open source > and please keep on doing this. +1 again. > I will probably never use Orgzly by myself because I like open > solutions. I accept that other people might want to have an > easy-to-use closed alternative solution to use Org on their phone. > It's so much better than using Evernote or other cloud-based > solutions. I might want to use Orgzly. (I do use Evernote occasionally, btw; yes, it is terrible.) BTW, one more question: what about all the emails about dropbox-based syncing of Emacs config or Org files? Why didn't they get banned? All are equal, but some are more equal than others? > Thanks for promoting Org! +1! -- Marcin Borkowski http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science Adam Mickiewicz University