Rasmus <ras...@gmx.us> writes: > I definitely think it is the more proper way to refer to an equation. But > it really depends on the document. E.g. mathtools also offer a set of > commands for referring to equations. I was considering an alist of > > (DESTINATION-TYPE REF-CMD-WITH-DESCRIPTION REF-CMD-WITHOUT-DESCRIPTION) > > But it might be an overkill, especially seeing that mathjax only supports > \ref and \eqref out of the box.
It really seems overkill. Note that you can write ([[eq1]]), too. Anyway, you can add another case in `org-latex-link' (fuzzy links part) if you think it is important to support \eqref. Regards,
