Nicolas Goaziou <[email protected]> writes:
> It would appear as, e.g., ((2)) indeed.
So what's the verdict? The upside is that \eqref{·} is more robust.
>> and *why* is orgmode.org hosting it? Privacy?
>
> I don't think CDN service was available at the time mathjax support was
> implemented. IMO, it hardly makes sense to host it now.
OK, I'll see if I try to make it point to the mathjax CDN and add the
option that enables \ref{·} and \eqref{·}.
—Rasmus
--
If you can mix business and politics wonderful things can happen!
