Nick Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It might still be logically true but generally it's best to say exactly what > things are i.e "is a non-negative integer.", if this change is made. If it's > not made then maybe the manual should be changed to be more precise: > > A "character" in Emacs Lisp is just an integer.
I think it would be more clear to say something like: A "character" in emacs is represented by a normal integer. Because emacs does have the concept of characters, separate from integers, it's just that they share a concrete representation in lisp. -Miles -- Suburbia: where they tear out the trees and then name streets after them. _______________________________________________ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
