In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Nick Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > It might still be logically true but generally it's best to say exactly what > > things are i.e "is a non-negative integer.", if this change is made. If > > it's > > not made then maybe the manual should be changed to be more precise: > > > > A "character" in Emacs Lisp is just an integer. > I think it would be more clear to say something like: > A "character" in emacs is represented by a normal integer. > Because emacs does have the concept of characters, separate from > integers, it's just that they share a concrete representation in lisp. I agree. --- Kenichi Handa [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
