> > > It might still be logically true but generally it's best to say exactly > > > what > > > things are i.e "is a non-negative integer.", if this change is made. If > > > it's > > > not made then maybe the manual should be changed to be more precise: > > > > > > A "character" in Emacs Lisp is just an integer. > > > I think it would be more clear to say something like: > > > A "character" in emacs is represented by a normal integer. > > > Because emacs does have the concept of characters, separate from > > integers, it's just that they share a concrete representation in lisp. > > I agree.
What's an abnormal integer? (A "character" in emacs is represented by an integer. ?) -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob _______________________________________________ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
