>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kenichi Handa wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Katsumi Yamaoka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> [...] and the patch[1] I posted first is better. >> But please don't merge it hastily if you have a doubt even if it >> is little. > I don't know about the code of mail-extr.el nor the detailed > format of a mail address (RFC-822?). So, I can't be sure, > either. It must be checked by someone who knows both of > them. I'm anxious for such a person. Otherwise... > Or, should we just install the change and see what happens? I hope to install the patch to only the Emacs CVS trunk, since I think it needs time to be tested widely. I'm not well informed about RFC2822 and what mail-extr.el does (especially the voodoo operation, which is disabled by default for Japanese names), too. Regards, _______________________________________________ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
