>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Richard Stallman wrote: > The way I posted, to make the syntax of all non-ASCII characters > `word', has a weakness. It is not effective to charsets that > are created after loading mail-extr.el.
> So, what about the first proposed fix? > The one that patched this particular function? I want someone to verify, whichever is used. Although I believe the first patch[1] does the right thing, is harmless, and can be used also in the emacs-unicode-2 branch, it is possible to make a mistake in any change and it might be able to improve further. I still think it is easier to verify the first patch than the second one. If no one turns up, I want the fix (whichever) to be installed in the trunk and the emacs-unicode-2 branch, not the EMACS_22_BASE branch. Regards, [1] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
