Hi Charles, I am not sure why, but we will try to use Firefox and keep testing and see how many tabs we can open and load up before it's locking up. We think it's pretty much the limit of the computers RAM and processor speed, and the internet connection related. How many tabs did you open before it's frozen up for you?
We have heard users complaining about Tiger causing their iChat totally not working (was working great under Panther), and others say something about the wireless router they use is now acting up under Tiger. Mostly all complaints are pointing to communication issues. We have a G4 iMac that will not automatically connect to wireless router every time we boot it up, but all others are behaving fine under Tiger. Firefox 1.5 Beta seems to work fine so far for us also, kind of like the gmail (still in beta also, but works). If I can open 100 tabs (which I doubt it), then I will let you know. --- Shenan >09/20/2005 09:13 AM Charles Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >On Sep 20, 2005, at 3:02 AM, Quadmation Inc. wrote: > >> you do mean 512MB not 512k RAM, right? > > I've been fooling with these things for so long I can remember >when 512K was a lot. I remember when Bill Gates said that no-one >really needed more than 64K. Slip of the fingertip. > >> Anyhow, I am sorry to hear that you have so much problem with Firefox, >> perhaps you can file bug reports, or just use Safari for now. > > How is filing a bug report supposed to help, when what I'm >describing is obviously a problem with Firefox for other people, and >can't be unknown to the developers? > >> Perhaps it has something to do with the sites you go to, as we have no >> problem using Firefox with machine from Powerbook Pismo, iBook G3 500, >> iMac G4 800, G4 400, G4 dual 867, G5's, Powerbook G4 500Mhz, 1Ghz, Mac >> Mini, plus many others .... But you know what? We have not really >> tried >> on any eMac as we just don't have one of those. > > I'm concerned that the browser that's supposed to be the bee's >knees, the hot stuff, might be sensitive to certain web pages. Is >there a list of the type of web pages that I'm supposed to avoid with >Firefox? Sure would be nice info to have if there is, or I could >just lump it in with the rest of the buggy temperamental problematic >browsers out there. But WAIT, it's the best there is, ain't it? > If I was going to wacko pages with wierd content or strange code >that might be a problem, but I'm not. > And how is an eMac going to be so different from any other Mac >that THAT should make any difference? Funny, I thought I bought a >Mac, not a one-off boutique CPU that requires special software. > We have no problem? Then how is it that at least two people on >this list, Mac devotees, are having trouble? > This sounds kinda like the answers I was used to getting from >the American car industry in the 70s - "Gee, WE don't have any >problems with our cars, what are YOU doing wrong?" > >> Hey, go download Firefox 1.5 beta and try that one out and see if it >> works better for you? ver. 1.5 sure sounds a lot more improvement >> than >> 1.0.6 > > Is this ALSO going to be the best, the snazziest, the smoothest >browser version that's ALSO sensitive to some web pages and web >content and hangs up and slows down? Or is this one REALLY the best, >no fooling, for sure? > I wouldn't be so snide about it but for the fact that I LIKE the >browser for some things, and I keep hearing about how other people >like it and what a quantum leap it is over other browsers, but then >when I point out that it's NOT all sweetness and light I get answers >like these. > >> Also, patch up to 10.4.2 Tiger with all the other security patch, etc. >> They do help. 10.4.0 is not so smooth. > > It's a new machine. The day I opened it up it had 10.4.2 on it, >and it's been updated with everything that Apple support has >suggested each and every day that they did. > I certainly will try the 1.5 beta version, and maybe I'll just >be stunned with that one. Who knows? ___________________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe send a mail message with a SUBJECT line of "unsubscribe" to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> or <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
