Yogi Sundaravadanam wrote: > Sixpack/transeq translations don’t match BLAST translation. This is > giving me such grief. After some research, I found out that there’s an > –alternate option in ‘transeq’ that translate the nucleic sequence to a > peptide, the BLAST way. Is it possible to do the same for Sixpack?
I am not sure what you mean by "BLAST translation". Do you mean the reverse frames are numbered differently? We followed the convention used by the Staden package. Would a -alternative option be useful in sixpack? regards, Peter Rice _______________________________________________ EMBOSS mailing list [email protected] http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/emboss
