>Do you mean the reverse frames are numbered differently? We followed >the >convention used by the Staden package. YES!
>Would a -alternative option be useful in sixpack? YES... is there an alternative option for sixpack, though? Yogi -----Original Message----- From: Peter Rice [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 20 June 2007 11:21 PM To: Yogi Sundaravadanam Cc: emboss Subject: Re: [EMBOSS] Sixpack/transeq frame translation Yogi Sundaravadanam wrote: > Sixpack/transeq translations dont match BLAST translation. This is > giving me such grief. After some research, I found out that theres an > alternate option in transeq that translate the nucleic sequence to a > peptide, the BLAST way. Is it possible to do the same for Sixpack? I am not sure what you mean by "BLAST translation". Do you mean the reverse frames are numbered differently? We followed the convention used by the Staden package. Would a -alternative option be useful in sixpack? regards, Peter Rice _______________________________________________ EMBOSS mailing list [email protected] http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/emboss
