On 11/13/2011 11:47 AM, andy pugh wrote: > On 13 November 2011 16:19, Kent A. Reed<[email protected]> wrote: > >> However, I recommend that we restrict the production image files (e.g., >> the files actually invoked in the asciidoc .txt files) to just two* >> formats---gif and png. > Why keep gif? png is effectively an updated .gif. > > I would rather we kept eps and png, because some content is better > suited to a vector format. Hi, Andy.
See my footnote on both points :-) There's only 19 gif files at present, so making the necessary changes is no more onerous than what I suggest for the eps files. As a matter of personal prejudice, I think svg is better suited for vector graphics exchange than eps. We aren't exploiting the "vector" nature of the images in production, anyway. The eps files were just a good intermediary step up from the dxf files created by EasyCAD, and those dxf files are nothing to write home about (see the README! I've been looking into that problem separately.) Regards, Kent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
