Chris Morley wrote: > It seems to me the EMC board needs to create a clear path > for our doc issue. > > I don't believe anyone is doing anything wrong, we just seem > to be going an a few different directions with a lack of communication. > Even when we try to communicate. :) Yes, I strongly support this! I think Kim Kirwan took on an ambitious reformatting of the whole layout and organization, but hasn't finished it, leaving the 2.5 docs in a shambles. I had been working on a significant update to the docs for the Pico Systems boards, now the PDFs are not being built, so I have no idea how the PDF form of the asciidoc will look. And, of course, NONE of the driver-related stuff is being built.
A clear direction on how to reintegrate the missing docs and what to do about the latexmath is really needed. Jon ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
