Eric Keller wrote: > On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Jon Elson <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Yes, I remembered there was some discussion of this, couldn't remember >> quite >> how far back. So, the situation is : if not homed, and moving, and you >> get >> an E-stop, it produces the message. If not homed, but not moving, you >> just get the usual E-stop condition. >> > > shouldn't an e-stop always give you an e-stop condition? It DOES give the E-stop condition, but if not homed, you ALSO get this message which is patently wrong. If not homed, how can there be a problem with un-homing?
Jon ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
