On 25/10/2012 13:03, andy pugh wrote:
> Not only that, but the patch under discussion is your patch file. 

Victor Rocco wrote
> Yes i have tried it in depth and have totally rewritten it to create mb2hal.

Oops. I really should have paid more attention. I feel a bit of a fool 
now :-[

> - When there was a big mess of code and i feel it confusing y started
>    to make some cosmetic changes (indentation, variable name clarification,
>    function names clarification, standardization of debug levels and
> messages, and more).

Yes. I originally wrote it to get my lathe running and always intended 
to clean it up before submiting but I never got around to it. Thanks for 
tidying it up and submitting it properly. Just out of interest has the 
ini file format changed?

By the way, I also have an Arduino sketch for a modbus slave, based on 
ModbusSlave by Juan Pablo Zometa. Currently it runs a custom multiplexed 
front panel but it would not take much to make it standalone. I have a 
mill conversion coming up that will need a bunch of I/O for the front 
panel so I'll need to rewrite the code for that. Would anyone be 
interested in a copy?

Les



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Reply via email to