On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 02:02:44PM -0700, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> 
> I agree that the bulk of our users don't know and don't care where the 
> log files are, and that many of our messages need to pop up in the GUI. 
>   Whatever changes, if any, can't break GUI message popups.

Ideally they would even be improved, especially the case I
mentioned, which is currently pretty horrible, and aside from
generic operator errors ("G1 without feed rate") the VERY most
important error situation.

> Logs are used by integrators and hackers and developers, and 
> occasionally by bug reporters.  It's one of my primary debugging aids, 

Don't get me wrong!  I'm all for whatever helps developers and
hackers and list/forum users and irc helpers too.  That does
probably involve sending stuff to a file (for attachment to a bug
report)?  Many programs can do reporting automatically, attaching
the last N logged messages to a bug report, for instance.  I think
that's probably not appropriate for our "can't start because your
hal file or tool table or whatever is bogus" situation, but maybe if
it goes to a pastebin instead of a bugtracker it would be?

I guess I just want us to consider what problem we are solving for
the user before we decide on an architecture.  I saw a lot of
"obviously syslog!" and I didn't understand why we were jumping
right to there, because it didn't seem to me that it solves any of
our primary problems.  I realize we are coming at this with opposite
approaches - that's good!

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Reply via email to