On Jul 6 2013 8:24 AM, Michael Haberler wrote: > Am 05.07.2013 um 22:18 schrieb Viesturs Lācis > <viesturs.la...@gmail.com>: >> >> I do not want to be the smart-pants, but velocity is 1st, >> acceleration is >> 2nd and jerk is 3rd derivative of position. Anyway, it is already in >> Araisrobo code, AFAIK their code lacks spindle synchronized motion. > > > Spindle-sync in fact is implemented in the araisrobo motion > component, and IMO in a better way than in the current motion > component, namely at a lower layer than the tp > > I do support the idea of the araisrobo tp code be brought into > linuxCNC > > however since there have been no significant efforts towards a > modularized motion comp so far, this suggests a second alternative > motion controller for now; in a more modularized approach, we would > have loadable trajectory planners which conform to an API without > layer violations
ooo... I like where you are going with this. It is also good to know that araisrobo's code does in fact implement spindle sync. EBo -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
