>Note that once conversion is done there remains no code in task which has to be >C++, as Python bindings for all moving parts will be available. I would have no >parting pains with the task code, and if somebody would want to redo this in >Python, it is time to start thinking to bring the - sorry, pathethic - >implementation of the task state machine into a comprehensible and adaptable >form, for instance by using the fysom.py state machine framework.
I agree that a clean redesign of that part would be a big progress as I experienced the pain caused by the attempt to understand the code. But I'm not sure if Python is adequate for such a integral component (I'm thinking about the usage on resource limited systems). Why not try a clean implementation in C? Sascha ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite! It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production. Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead. Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
