On Aug 11 2013 2:29 PM, Michael Haberler wrote:
> Am 11.08.2013 um 21:53 schrieb Sascha Ittner 
> <sascha.itt...@modusoft.de>:
>>
>>> the actual functionality of that clunker is moderate, and so are 
>>> the
>>> performance requirements, so there's just no reason I could see to 
>>> retain the
>>> C++ deterrent.
>>
>> That's right. It's not a high performance application.
>
> Here's some figures:
>
> The sim/axis/axis_mm.ini runs about 4 minutes to completion.
>
> The number of motions generated is 196, all at the beginning; those
> are pass-through from the interpreter (eventually; right now they 
> need
> to be transcoded a bit before motion).
>
> The total number of tickets (=gui/task) interactions during this run
> is --> 20 <--. A well-tuned kid with a smartphone can easily beat 
> that
> rate with SMS;)

you might be able to get a hexaped octogenarian loaded down with 
lutafisk to beat that with her walker...

That sounds like a very low bar.

   EBo --


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite!
It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production.
Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead. 
Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Reply via email to