I am sure there is...I like the point that Chris brought with the re-map option. I also realize that he brought it up in his initial post but I just felt that the majority of users are not at that point where we have to worry about more than 99 tools on a lathe.
I can see that if Linuxcnc has to be re-worked to handle more than one page for different kinds of off-sets that it will pay to make sure it is done with thought and flexibility. Jeff Johnson [email protected] Superior Roll & Turning 734-279-1831 -----Original Message----- From: andy pugh [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 10:25 AM To: EMC developers Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] RFC: Support for multiple tool offsets (aka wear offsets) On 30 May 2014 14:56, Jeff Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > The lathe won't hold them....At least ours won't. There is an argument for having the tool number refer to a tool, not a slot in the carousel of a specific machine. (espcially if using VDI mounting, for example) -- atp If you can't fix it, you don't own it. http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Time is money. Stop wasting it! Get your web API in 5 minutes. www.restlet.com/download http://p.sf.net/sfu/restlet _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Time is money. Stop wasting it! Get your web API in 5 minutes. www.restlet.com/download http://p.sf.net/sfu/restlet _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
