> or here:  https://forum.qt.io/topic/61899/qt5-embedded-framebuffer-poor-gui/4
> .... and than in stack :
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/50236156/making-a-qt-gui-application-run-on-a-framebuffer-in-linux
> ....
> 
> never interested first on these framebuffer .... but seems quite old
> type and not very interesting because if you use qt on old pc or
> xxxxxxPI and other project, you can use QT framework as windows
> manager without all SO and drive Lcnc from these point, without start
> a complete linux SO. I think these way perform same result than use
> framebuffer (on same hardware) but with more feature.
If framebuffer is faster or use less resources and work equally well I would 
use it but to spend any development time on it I am in doubt.

> New version of QT like 12 or 14 is focused on embedded linux system
> ... so better is use it.

If doing something new I would use last version.


_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Reply via email to