> If doing something new I would use last version. for sure .... you can use pyton qt Lcnc HMI or make your customized one. You can perform better result compared framebuffer way .... I don't think you would use an old phone hardware for run a cnc machine..... or you plan to make a 3d cheeper printer? Any how for arm and cortex based hardware there are more and more project based on qt for embedded linux ...
Il giorno dom 22 mar 2020 alle ore 14:14 Nicklas Karlsson <nicklas.karlsso...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > > or here: > > https://forum.qt.io/topic/61899/qt5-embedded-framebuffer-poor-gui/4 > > .... and than in stack : > > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/50236156/making-a-qt-gui-application-run-on-a-framebuffer-in-linux > > .... > > > > never interested first on these framebuffer .... but seems quite old > > type and not very interesting because if you use qt on old pc or > > xxxxxxPI and other project, you can use QT framework as windows > > manager without all SO and drive Lcnc from these point, without start > > a complete linux SO. I think these way perform same result than use > > framebuffer (on same hardware) but with more feature. > If framebuffer is faster or use less resources and work equally well I would > use it but to spend any development time on it I am in doubt. > > > New version of QT like 12 or 14 is focused on embedded linux system > > ... so better is use it. > > If doing something new I would use last version. > > > _______________________________________________ > Emc-developers mailing list > Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
