The issue is that linuxcnc and linuxcnc-rt would be the same as linuxcnc
doesn't get built differently, whether you're using POSIX rt threads, or POSIX
non-rt threads. I think it should be `linuxcnc` and `linuxcnc-rtai`. linuxcnc's
binaries only change if using RTAI.
Alec
On Friday, January 17, 2025 at 10:51:24 AM CST, Nicklas SB Karlsson
<n...@nksb.eu> wrote:
Looking at Linux kernel names there is:
linux-image without postfix this is ordinary user space I think anyway
suitable for simulation.
linux-image-rt this is with real time
linux-image-rtai
Below make sense?
linucnc
linucnc-rt
linucnc-rtai
Nicklas
tor 2025-01-16 klockan 11:07 -0500 skrev gene heskett:
> On 1/16/25 10:39, andy pugh wrote:
> > It is perhaps unfortunate that the name of the LinuxCNC package on Debian
> > is "linuxcnc-uspace"
> >
> > It would probably make more sense for the package name to be "linuxcnc" and
> > to have "linucnc-rtai" as an alternative from our own servers (where the
> > rtai packages exist)
> >
> > Can we change this for the 2.10 release?
> >
> > Should we?
> I'm for the change, Andy.
>
> Cheers, Gene Heskett, CET.
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
