Does the Linuxcnc ISO work? It should cos the Debian version is a pre release
and it was getting 2.9.4. I'll try on a VM tonight
On 2025-10-28 09:21, andy pugh <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Oct 2025 at 20:31, rodw <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Andy, I think your script would need to update apt pinning to force the
> > use of the linuxcnc repo for Bookworm 2.94 (and probably for Trixie and
> > later too)
> > Ref: https://wiki.debian.org/AptConfiguration
>
> Pinning might be wise, but I don't think it is why my dev system can't
> see anything newer than 2.9.4.
> A test VM sees 2.9.7 from Bookworm perfectly well. And my Bookworm Pi
> also has no problems.
>
> But my compile/test machine:
>
> andypugh@rm-one:/etc/apt$ sudo apt-cache policy linuxcnc-uspace
> linuxcnc-uspace:
> Installed: (none)
> Candidate: 1:2.9.4
> Version table:
> 1:2.9.4 500
> 500 https://www.linuxcnc.org bookworm/2.9-uspace amd64 Packages
> 1:2.9.3 500
> 500 https://www.linuxcnc.org bookworm/2.9-uspace amd64 Packages
> 1:2.9.2 500
> 500 https://www.linuxcnc.org bookworm/2.9-uspace amd64 Packages
> 1:2.9.1 500
> 500 https://www.linuxcnc.org bookworm/2.9-uspace amd64 Packages
> 2.9.0~pre1+git20230208.f1270d6ed7-1+deb12u1 500
> 500 http://deb.debian.org/debian bookworm/main amd64 Packages
>
> So linuxcnc.org has priority 500, but it isn't seeing the newer
> versions. There may be something wrong in the archive (getting all the
> files in all the right places is tedious and it's easy to make
> mistakes)
>
> --
> atp
> "A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is
> designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and
> lunatics."
> — George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-developers mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
