>  Rod Webster
 >Your image you made me for my rpi4b is working fine almost as is, but   
 >count me in as interested.  I contribute monthly to the armbian project   
 >but haven't established a good conversation just yet.

Gene, sorry but I won't be heading that way! I did give Armbian a good go    a 
few years ago but the board I chose just wasn't good enough for Linuxcnc.
 
I do wonder if there is a viable case to adopt EVL .Recently I decided to build 
a small machine and I had a 15 year old PC which    thought was old enough to 
have a parallel port but it didn't. I considered buying a card and a BOB, and 
also even a Chinese clone of the 7i92. But in the end, I bought a single 4 axis 
Lichuan ethercat drive for about $90 USD. Its hard to argue with that price!
 
But now Robert has suggested making room for a new trajectory planner might 
redefine the thought process.
 
Rod Webster  

 
On 2026-02-19 18:11, Robert Schöftner  <[email protected]>  wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, dem 18.02.2026 um 13:01 -0600 schrieb Bari:
> >  Since RTAI has reached the end of its life the way forward might be    
> >  Xenomai 4  https://evlproject.org/overview/
> >    
> >  How many users might find this useful? it will be lots of work and we
> >  aren't sure yet how to support Mesa cards with it yet.
> >    
>
> According to https://evlproject.org/core/user-api/thread/index.html it
> doesn't seem to require realtime stuff running in kernel space. Even
> networking seems to be possible
> https://evlproject.org/core/user-api/net/index.html
>
> RTAI really is a different kingdom than userspace. Getting rid of
> kernel space code (RTAI) while keeping support for both userspace
> realtime systems (rt preempt, xenomai/libevl) should allow massive
> simplifications in code and avoid additional "split horizons" in new
> developments like the new trajectory planner that will need parts to   
> think longer than is comfortable/possible in the rt domain.   
>
> --   
> Robert Schöftner  <[email protected]>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-developers mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Reply via email to