Hello everyone, I would like your opinion (based both on your knowledge of the iso25/iso45001 and personal experience and view) on the "certification\testing lab anomaly".
The issue is this: if one entity (let's call it the "LAB") offers both to consult and fix technical problems AND to test and verify the product after it has been fixed, don't we have an inherently unhealthy situation? Also,if the LAB offers a "fixed price" for a specific job(i.e. $XXX to get certification to Y), doesn't this too make a potentially unhealthy situation? Don't get me wrong. I'm not accusing anyone and I believe they all mean well and make a honest living, but is this 100% kosher? I'm not familiar with the various standards governing the internal workings of the labs, but do they cover this issue? thanks for your opinions moshe valdman
