I fully agree with Charles. I also want to add that there are many host computers which will pass class B emissions with a full complement of external peripherals, but a few from this group which will fail emissions as soon as an add-in card is placed in them.
In short, you should test your support equipment first, then test the support equipment with your add-in card installed. If the frequency of failure is not associated with any of the clocks in your board, you *might* have a problem with a host computer polluting its expansion bus. Once you have found your ideal test setup, *keep it under lock and key!* Steve Chin StreamLogic Corp. Menlo Park, CA [email protected] As always, the views expressed here are my own and do not represent those of anyone else! -------------------------------------- List-Post: [email protected] Date: 12/11/96 7:49 AM To: Steve Chin From: Charles Blackham DD-KB Martin Amendment A1, 1995, to EN55022:1994 states: "In the case of Printed Wiring Board Assemblies (PWBA), separately marketed for the enhancement of diverse host units, the PWBA (e.g. ISDN interface, CPU, adaptor cards, etc.) shall be tested in at least one appropriate representative host unit of the PWBA manufacturer's choice so as to ensure compliance of the PWBA with the entire population of hosts in which it is intended to be installed." So according to the standard, the required minimum number of hosts in one. I believe that one is sufficient, especially where you have no idea what computer the end user will have. I would always check the Emissions from support equipment before adding an adaptor card, as combining CE marked computers,monitors, keyboards etc. does not always produce a combination that is still meets class B limits ! Charlie Blackham x31592 Approvals Engineer Madge Networks Limited ------------------ RFC822 Header Follows ------------------ Received: by sledgehammer.com with SMTP;11 Dec 1996 07:49:28 -0800 Received: from ruebert.ieee.org by oz.sledgehammer.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id HAA04076; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 07:51:37 -0800 Received: (from daemon@localhost) by ruebert.ieee.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id FAA04454 for emc-pstc-list; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 05:49:47 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <[email protected]> In-Reply-To: <126FAE3201E03700> List-Post: [email protected] Date: Wed, 11 Dec 96 10:35:25 -0000 From: "Charles Blackham DD-KB" <[email protected]> Organization: Madge Networks To: [email protected], [email protected] (Martin Ginty) Subject: Re: Computer board tests X-mailer: Connect2-SMTP 4.00 MHS to SMTP Gateway Sender: [email protected] Precedence: bulk Reply-To: "Charles Blackham DD-KB" <[email protected]> X-Resent-To: Multiple Recipients <[email protected]> X-Listname: emc-pstc X-List-Description: Product Safety Tech. Committee, EMC Society X-Info: Help requests to [email protected] X-Info: [Un]Subscribe requests to [email protected] X-Moderator-Address: [email protected]
