Text item: The CB scheme is based on IEC950, therefore if you request just a CB report that's all you'll typically get. However if you request your CB report to cover EN60950 with group differences and national deviations for the 30 or so members of the CB scheme then you'll get a report which covers everything.
[email protected] Ron raised my curiosity so I looked at the single CB report which we have and it only makes reference to IEC950 with no reference to EN60950. Gabriel Roy Hughes Network Systems MD ----------------------------- Ron Pickard wrote------------------------------------------------------ Finn-Erick, I draw exception to your comments below: > A CB-test report alone would not be sufficient as it refers to an IEC-standard. For the > LVD compliance with relevant European Norm (e.g. EN 60950 for ITE) is required, > so you will need an additional report covering the differences between the > IEC-standard and the EN. A CB report/certificate may not only refer to an IEC standard. In the CB reports that I am familiar with, they all incorporate IEC950 and EN60950 into the same report along with the respective amendments in force at the time. The CB certificates indicate the standard(s) applied and which national deviations were considered/evaluated. It's important to note here that these reports came from 2 different NCBs. However, if a CB report evaluation is only to IEC950, then a separate EN60950 evaluation may be required. But if so, so much for the one-stop shopping approach as the CB Scheme touts. Comments from anyone with CB experience for clarification, especially the NCBs? Regards Ron Pickard [email protected] Text item: External Message Header The following mail header is for administrative use and may be ignored unless there are problems. ***IF THERE ARE PROBLEMS SAVE THESE HEADERS***. X-Moderator-Address: [email protected] X-Info: [Un]Subscribe requests to [email protected] X-Info: Help requests to [email protected] X-List-Description: Product Safety Tech. Committee, EMC Society X-Listname: emc-pstc X-Resent-To: Multiple Recipients <[email protected]> Reply-To: Gabriel Roy/HNS <[email protected]> Precedence: bulk Sender: [email protected] Content-Type: Text/Plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: RE: Norway List-Post: [email protected] Date: 21 Jan 97 16:26:13 EST From: Gabriel Roy/HNS <[email protected]> cc: EMC-PSTC <[email protected]> To: Ron Pickard <[email protected]> Message-Id: <[email protected]> Received: (from daemon@localhost) by ruebert.ieee.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id QAA17357 for emc-pstc-list; Tue, 21 Jan 1997 16:38:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from ruebert.ieee.org by marceau.fm.intel.com (8.8.4/10.0i); Wed, 22 J an 1997 01:49:45 GMT Received: from marceau.fm.intel.com (marceau.fm.intel.com [132.233.247.8]) by fm mail.fm.intel.com (8.7.4/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA02006 for <Craig_M_Britland@ccm .fm.intel.com>; Tue, 21 Jan 1997 17:46:54 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: [email protected]
