I have been reading some of the responses to this note.  It appears many of 
   us product safety professionals are missing some key points.  I would like 
to 
   thank the author for bringing this up for discussion.  This is what makes 
the 
   bulletin board so valuable.
   
   A GFI is a very simple devices that works by monitoring the amount of 
current 
   that flows in through the hot and out through the neutral. If there is a 
   difference of more than about 3 mA (and no more than 5), the device trips.  
   Basically speaking, out must equal in.  If it doesn't, current has found 
   another path to travel to ground.
   
   A persons resistance to fatal shock varies with a multitude of factors, but 
   it is generally safe to say that anything above an amp flowing through the 
   body is fatal.  Our nerves are designed to handle milli and micro amps, and 
   anything significantly above that will burn them out rapidly. If the nerves 
   don't work, key muscles like the heart become ineffective.
   
   Unless you are filling your bath tub with distilled water, there are enough 
   conductive impurities to allow small amounts of current flow.  In many 
   municipalities that are large amounts of iron in the supplies.  In addition, 
   almost every city adds chlorine, which is somewhat corrosive, and will pull 
   the copper and iron ions off of the distribution system piping.  Again, 
   remember that we are talking about very small amounts of current.
   
   Being a parent myself, I know what it is like to let two young children in 
   the bathtub at the same time.  There was likely water all over the floor, 
the 
   sides of the tub, various toys around the area, etc.  Since there was no GFI 
   breaker installed, I am guessing that this was a fairly old dwelling (GFI's 
   have been required by code since the 70's).  This means the appliances were 
   probably scratched, dinged, dented, etc, and the pipes were copper and cast 
   iron.  It is also code required that metal supply piping in houses be tied 
to 
   ground somewhere in the dwelling, so there ire ample routes to ground.
   
   Most lighting circuits in houses are either 15 or 20 amp circuits.  The 
   breakers are designed to allow for "turn on" surges, meaning they will not 
   immediately trip if current flow crosses the threshold.  Some breakers will 
   operate at 20% overage for u to 5 minutes.  Also,  breakers are generally 
   only guaranteed to be accurate for a limited number of trips. There may in 
   the case have been a full 15 or 20 amps going to ground.  Even though these 
   girls were at the opposite end of the tub, they were able to get enough of 
   that current flow to kill them, even if it wasn't the entire amount 
   
   Any way you look at this, it was a tragedy.  I reject the idea that this was 
   just a bad set of circumstances.  The NFPA claims that bathroom 
   electrocutions have drooped by over 90% since the requirement for GFI 
   breakers was added to the Code.  This is a compelling statistic. 
   
   The bottom line is that the newspapers were right when they stated that this 
   event would not have occurred for want of a $20.00 item available at any 
   hardware store.  If you are evaluating system designs, and there are single 
   phase low power systems where people could come in contact with electricity 
   and water at the same time, remember this.  The Code requires GFI's 
   essentially anywhere there is water, and/or portable hand tools (drills, 
   mixers, and yes even hair dryers). The way implement this requirement 
   determines if we consider the code a proactive approach, or an obstacle.  I 
   have often seen convenience outlets in machine tools that are not GFI 
   protected, and heard the argument that a GFI is not required by the code.  
   This misses the point. Lets make sure that we all learn the important 
lessons 
   from this event.
   
   Rick Koski
   Director, ES&H
   SEMI/SEMATECH


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: GFIs, Hairdryers, and Bathtubs ...
Author:  [email protected]
List-Post: [email protected]
Date:    8/13/97 11:51 AM


Recently somewhere back in the news (couple of weeks ago), 
two children died when one of them used a hairdryer in 
the tub.  A discussion this accident with some lead me 
to a counter-intuitive result from my experience in 
product safety. 

************************************************** 

Given Situation #1: 

1. Person in a tub of water sitting at the opposite 
   end of the tub than the drain. 

2. The tub is ungrounded with water in it.  Ungrounded 
   meaning that the drain is plastic piping. 

3. A 2-wire hair dryer (either On or OFF) is dropped 
   into  the water at the drain end of the tub. The person 
   in the tub is neither in contact with the hairdryer, 
   not anything that would be grounded. 

   The hairdryer has a plastic case. 

Result: 

1. Since there is no path to ground from the hairdryer 
   through the person in the tub to ground, no current 
   should flow *thru* the person in the tub. The person 
   is in no harm.  

2. Since no current is flowing through ground, 
   the GFI won't trip.  If the water allows sufficient 
   current to flow by shorting between the HOT and 
   NEUTRAL in the hairdryer, the breaker will trip.  

************************************************** 

Given Situation #2: 

Same as situation #1 except that the drain is now 
a grounded metal pipe. 

Is there a sufficient parallel path to be lethal 
to the person in the tub?  Seems as though the 
parallel path for the hairdryer is straight to 
the drain. 

Result: 

1. Person is still unharmed. 

2. GFI trips. 

************************************************** 

Are my conclusions correct? 

Is the only time one can be electrocuted in a tub 
when they are in contact with a ground and holding 
the hairdryer? 

Is a person really killed in a tub with hairdryer 
by drowning rather than electrocution? 

I'm beginning to doubt that I know exactly how 
a person is killed in a tub with a hairdryer. 

Or, am I making this way more complicated 
than it is? 

Comments? 




Reply via email to