Probably from your physics days you will remember the magnet and iron 
particles on a sheet of paper.  There was two obvious concentration
points
with a lot of lines taking different paths to the other concentration
point.
With two conductors in water, you have the same analogy except that it 
is occurring in three dimensions.  There is no single concentration flow
path 
for the current to go from one point to another.  With a person in the
tub,
some of these paths will pass through the person, and will tend to be 
concentrated because of the lower body impedance.  If the tub drain is 
insulated as in new construction, then there will be a path from one
side 
of the on-off switch to the other.  With a single pole switch, and all
of
the resistance wire as the other side of the line, the current path is
very 
broad, indeed.  The exposure to current flow is very great, and skin
resistance is lowered since the water is in =intimate= contact on a
large 
portion of the body.  It only takes micro-amps across the heart to cause
the heart to react and cause death.  

Now if the drain is metallic, likely it is also a possible return path
for the 
current flow.  While the distance is much further from the switch
contact,
whether on or off, the switch is the source contact if the new model has
the 
fat blade that polarizes the source.  The return sources are the heating
elements, the other side of the switch contact, and the tub drain.  The
person
in the tub does not have to touch any metal to have current to pass
through
his body.  Once the current flow starts, likely the muscles will
contract, and
the person is powerless to get out of the tub.  Current will stop the
heart 
by turning it into quivering jelly, and the person dies from a lack of 
circulation.  

Now lets us assume there is a GFI in the circuit, then the person still
gets a 
shock, but it is only for a part of the cycle, and likely less than the
time the 
heart can react to become quivering jelly.  In order for the GFI to
work, the
current difference in differential transformer must trigger the circuit
breaker.
If the person is in the current path, he will get a shock in order for
the GFI 
to work.  

In the newer models of hair dryers, there is a sense wire which bypasses
the differential transformer, and the interrupter in the dryer plug will
operate, 
since the current is divided between the heating element and the sense
wire
and some of the current bypasses the differential transformer so that
the
breaker operates from the current in the transformer.  

Since the dryer can let water pass through the device, the plastic
enclosure 
does not enclose the hazardous current path through the water.  It does
not 
matter where the person is in the tub, or whether he make physical 
contact with the dryer.  It does not matter whether the tub has a
metallic drain 
or a plastic drain.  If the dryer is in the water, the person in the
tube will have current going through the body.  The only salvation in
the entire scenario is
the interrupter that can sense the differences in the return path and
trip a 
breaker.  In the particular case of the dryer, I would prefer the sense
wire
type, as this is independent of a ground return through a plastic pipe
or a 
metal pipe.  

The moral of this story is that you should become a dirty old man and
never bathe again!  Its safer.  

Manning Rose, NCR Corporation, Dayton, Ohio, [email protected]
>----------
>From:  [email protected][SMTP:[email protected]]
>Sent:  Wednesday, August 13, 1997 4:51 PM
>To:    IEEE Product Safety Technical Committee -
>Subject:       GFIs, Hairdryers, and Bathtubs ... 
>
>Recently somewhere back in the news (couple of weeks ago), 
>two children died when one of them used a hairdryer in 
>the tub.  A discussion this accident with some lead me 
>to a counter-intuitive result from my experience in 
>product safety. 
>
>************************************************** 
>
>Given Situation #1: 
>
>1. Person in a tub of water sitting at the opposite 
>   end of the tub than the drain. 
>
>2. The tub is ungrounded with water in it.  Ungrounded 
>   meaning that the drain is plastic piping. 
>
>3. A 2-wire hair dryer (either On or OFF) is dropped 
>   into  the water at the drain end of the tub. The person 
>   in the tub is neither in contact with the hairdryer, 
>   not anything that would be grounded. 
>
>   The hairdryer has a plastic case. 
>
>Result: 
>
>1. Since there is no path to ground from the hairdryer 
>   through the person in the tub to ground, no current 
>   should flow *thru* the person in the tub. The person 
>   is in no harm.  
>
>2. Since no current is flowing through ground, 
>   the GFI won't trip.  If the water allows sufficient 
>   current to flow by shorting between the HOT and 
>   NEUTRAL in the hairdryer, the breaker will trip.  
>
>************************************************** 
>
>Given Situation #2: 
>
>Same as situation #1 except that the drain is now 
>a grounded metal pipe. 
>
>Is there a sufficient parallel path to be lethal 
>to the person in the tub?  Seems as though the 
>parallel path for the hairdryer is straight to 
>the drain. 
>
>Result: 
>
>1. Person is still unharmed. 
>
>2. GFI trips. 
>
>************************************************** 
>
>Are my conclusions correct? 
>
>Is the only time one can be electrocuted in a tub 
>when they are in contact with a ground and holding 
>the hairdryer? 
>
>Is a person really killed in a tub with hairdryer 
>by drowning rather than electrocution? 
>
>I'm beginning to doubt that I know exactly how 
>a person is killed in a tub with a hairdryer. 
>
>Or, am I making this way more complicated 
>than it is? 
>
>Comments? 
>
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to