>From personal discussions with the FCC, as far as they (FCC) are concerned, >EMC is a dead issue. The FCC has on several occasions expressed to me that >they are not in the business of regulating the quality of any device (except >maybe broadcast receivers and such). They are strictly only concerned with >issues that relate to broadcasting and/or that affect the radio frequency >spectrum. EMC, to the FCC, is a quality issue to be regulated by the product >market.
EMC, if necessary, will have to be regulated through another government division office instituted by congress. As of this date, congress has not taken up the subject. Bandele ---------- From: WOODS, RICHARD [SMTP:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 1998 10:00 AM To: [email protected]; '[email protected]' Subject: RE: Input for a presentation Art Wall of the FCC gave presentations at the last couple of EMC Symposium's on where the FCC is going. Check the records. At Chicago, the issue of immunity was raised. The only people in the audience that supported having legal requirements were the military suppliers and customers. > ---------- > From: [email protected][SMTP:[email protected]] > Reply To: [email protected] > Sent: Saturday, August 22, 1998 11:04 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Input for a presentation > > Hi folks, > > Next month I'm going to give a talk on " The status of EMC in America". > This > talk will be presented in England, Sept 16th and 18th. > > For the record I'm English, and have lived in the USA for 14 years working > in > the Military, Automotive, Aerospace and Industrial EMC areas. I have > formed > some opinions which I hope are representitive of the majority of folks > here. > However, as I put this talk together, I would appreciate input from list > members, especially if they reside in the USA or deal in EMC issues with > USA > companies. > > I'm particularly intersted in: > > => Where Military EMC is going > > => Where the FCC is going > > => Why we don't have ENFORCED immunity standards in the USA > > => Issues in dealing with Europe > > => Attitudes of companies/managers that have to deal with EMC > > I'll take any ( factual ) input your prepared to share, also, opinions are > fine too: but please make it clear they are your opinion. Feel free to > contact > me by > > e-mail [email protected] > FAX 815 877 8844 ( please include cover sheet ) > Person I will be at the EMC Symposium in Denver wearing an > L F Research > shirt, just stop me and say hi! > > > I'll try to post the sides if list members are interested. > > Thanks, > > Derek Walton. > Owner: L F Research EMC Design and Test Facility, Poplar Grove, IL, USA > > --------- > This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. > To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected] > with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the > quotes). For help, send mail to [email protected], > [email protected], or [email protected] (the list > administrators). > --------- This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected] with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the quotes). For help, send mail to [email protected], [email protected], or [email protected] (the list administrators). --------- This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected] with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the quotes). For help, send mail to [email protected], [email protected], or [email protected] (the list administrators).
