Happens I agree with you, John. But the economics of the proposal were so attractive that somebody persuaded the FCC to make it -- and we all had a good long while to comment on on it, too. I think the bottom line is, if these things WERE tested, they'd fail with some regularity, but not as often and not as badly as the ordinary "clones" used to. That is, I think, some improvement.
The Commission has taken the approach that if there are no complaints, there is no problem. Since people will put up with mountains of inconvenience rather than stand up and be heard, this has lead to the OFFICIAL conclusion that there is no interference. But I tell all my Ham Radio friends (I'm KA5S) to complain EVERY TIME they receive interference. Don't know if they do. I'm working on a very widespread case (on my own nickel -- it's for me) right now which I believe to be power-company carrier-current harmonics. There's a LOT of RFI out here, and it is getting worse! Cortland ====================== Original Message Follows ==================== >> Date: 25-Nov-98 05:45:28 MsgID: 1065-60387 ToID: 72146,373 From: "Kretsch, John" >INTERNET:[email protected] Subj: RE: Question on FCC Class B certifications. Chrg: $0.00 Imp: Norm Sens: Std Receipt: No Parts: 1 Just out of curiosity, how come "assembled from FCC Class B compliant components" seems to fly but CE + CE = CE obviously does not? What am I missing here? BTW, I don't have much faith taking a piece of equipment that has been "assembled from FCC Class B compliant components" to a test lab and expect it to pass. Regards, John R. Kretsch, P.E. Compliance Engineering Supervisor ADC Broadband Communications [email protected] -----Original Message----- --------- This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected] with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the quotes). For help, send mail to [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], or [email protected] (the list administrators).
