Could you be more specific about what is ment by "functional" and "security" demands?
> ---------- > From: petter.gar...@enator.se[SMTP:petter.gar...@enator.se] > Reply To: petter.gar...@enator.se > Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 1998 3:42 AM > To: emc-p...@ieee.org > Subject: Poll, Changes to the EMC directive > > Hello everybody > > A new discussion has started in Europe about redesigning the EMC > directive. > > Im intrested to know of this groups opinion. > > The proposal is to remove the functional demands on products and only > have security demands for immunity testing. > > To check the opinion of this group please reply to this mail direct to > me (not the list) with one of the following lines and Ill post a > compilation of the results. > > 1. YES , I agree with the removal of fuctional demands from the EMC > directive. > > 2. NO , Funktional demands should continue to be a part of the EMC > directive. > > Ill start compiling the results at the end of this week (june 19) and > mail the results next week. > > Thank you > > -- > Petter Gärdin > ENATOR Communications AB > P.O. Box 360 > S-83125 ÖSTERSUND > SWEDEN > > Email: petter.gar...@enator.se > Amateur Radio Callsign: SM3PXO > Phone: +46 63 156233 > Fax: +46 63 156199 > >
