Thanks. I had a similar thought, but I believe that under an IEC950 type of approval, unless a symbol comes from IEC417, it cannot be used without an accompanying explanation.
Do I have that philosophy right? Regards, Jim Eichner Statpower Technologies Corporation [email protected] http://www.statpower.com Any opinions expressed are those of my invisible friend, who really exists. Honest. > -----Original Message----- > From: Cortland Richmond [SMTP:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, June 04, 1998 1:47 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Symbol for "flashing" > > Don't know if it's an approved symbology, but one does > come to mind. HTat's a drawing of the LED lit as having > rays == short radiant lines == emitting from it. Dark, > no lines. Slow flashing, a series of relatively long > dashes, eash with a "lit" symbol over it and fast falshing, > a series of short dashes (or even dots) each with a > "lit" symbol. > > Seems to me that would be self-explanatory, but as I > mentioned, I do not know if it is anyone's approved > symbol. > > Cortland Richmond
