Hi All,

Jim has a good idea here. I have an experiment I use in presentations that
shows the amount of an ESD current that couples onto a probe body (Fischer
F-33-1) varies by about a factor of two depending how the lead is dressed
as it passes through the probe, perpendicular through the center being the
lowest.

Doug


At 01:46 PM 6/21/99 -0400, Lacey,Scott wrote:
>
>In my opinion, letting the cable insulation touch the probe body is never a
>good idea. I always try to "shim" the cable and probe in order to center the
>cable within the probe opening. The trick is to keep the shims outside of
>the probe. A good trick is to make a "V block" out of wood, with a deeper
>center notch for the probe body. This insures good radial and axial
>alignment (for consistency) and also prevents the probe body from touching
>the ground plane.
>Scott
>
>       -----Original Message-----
>       From:   Jim Eichner [SMTP:[email protected]]
>       Sent:   Monday, June 21, 1999 1:10 PM
>       To:     EMC-PSTC
>       Subject:        RE: Current probe problem
>
>
>       In his write up of the problem, Doug writes
>
>       "If possible, current probes should be positioned on the measured
>cable
>       so as to minimize the potential between the cable and the current
>probe
>       body. This usually means locating the probe near the ground/chassis
>end
>       of a circuit."
>
>       Following a tip from someone on this forum quite a while ago, I have
>       observed significant variation in the spectrum of noise along the
>length
>       of a cable.  I have started doing my cable current measurements by
>       sliding the probe over the length of the cable, with my spectrum
>       analyzer in max hold mode.  I assume I get a "worst case sweep" by
>doing
>       this, as I pick up the worst of everything at any position on the
>cable.
>
>
>       Following Doug's advice above, or any instance of using a current
>probe
>       in a single fixed position, could result in the probe being
>positioned
>       right at a null for a frequency of interest, sending you on a wild
>goose
>       chase looking for some other source.  
>
>       Does Doug or anyone else have similar experience or a better way to
>       overcome the problem?
>
>       Regards,
>
>       Jim Eichner
>       > Senior Regulatory Compliance Engineer
>       Statpower Technologies Corporation
>       [email protected]
>       http://www.statpower.com
>       Any opinions expressed are those of my invisible friend, who really
>       exists, but can only be seen by my dog.  Honest.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>       
>
>---------
>This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
>To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected]
>with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
>quotes).  For help, send mail to [email protected],
>[email protected], [email protected], or
>[email protected] (the list administrators).
>
>
>
>

---------
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected]
with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], or
[email protected] (the list administrators).

Reply via email to