Hi Folks
            John Allen has opened my can of worms even further with 
his very useful comments to my e.mail. Obviously the military/defence 
situation is somewhat different as he states but maybe there is some 
guidance there.

The answers to his comments are his follows:-

Our products are large Scientific instruments and the EMC, LVD
and Product liability directives apply

The standards we have applied are EN 61326-1 and EN 61010-1

Servicing would be to a Minor level although in some instances access 
is required to units to carry out "conditioning procedures"

The target customer is generally a qualified Scientist but not 
necessarily from an Electrical/Electronic Background.

Manuals to an appropriate level could be produced but are currently 
only available  to our service organisation.

My main area of difficulty lies in that we rely on the fact 
that our electronic units are located behind locked doors or screwed 
panels to achieve our LVD compliance.

It then seems at odds to encourage the user to undo these panels to 
carry out routine service or repair tasks.

Also I am very uncomfortable on the product liability front if 
someone was hurt or killed because we had suggested he opened panels 
behind which were dangerous voltages.

It has been suggested that we should obtain a declaration that the 
user has qualified trained staff who are capable of doing this work. 
Could staff be regarded as qualified if they had not been trained by 
us in the use of proprietry units? Many of our instruments go to 
academic users who usually consider themselves competant in every 
area. I would be interested in the groups comments in this area.

Finally as John states very specific instructions would have to be 
given on reassembling units in order to maintain the units/systems 
emc signature

These are the main reasons I feel these operations should only be 
carried out by our own Staff. Although I can understand a customers 
position when he has a piece of capital equipment worth up to stlg750k 
he is unable to use due to the failure of a simple component

Regards

Brian Harlowe 
* opinions expressed here are personal and in no way reflect the position of VG 
Scientific

---------
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected]
with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], or
[email protected] (the list administrators).

Reply via email to