> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ken Javor [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2000 8:04 PM
> To: jestuckey; '[email protected]'; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Vibration and Shock Testing
> 
> 
> 
> A general philosophical response to Mr. Stuckey's specific 
> and cogent reply.
> Twenty years ago when I told colleagues I did military 
> engineering, I would
> uniformly get comments about how could I stand the 
> bureaucracy, red tape,
> and yes, comments to the effect of Customers of limited intelligence.
> 
> Fade to the present, and I feel exactly the same way when 
> someone tells me
> they do commercial EMC/safety/etc., especially after 
> reviewing the e-mail
> trails I get off this service.  And DoD  EMC seems to have a 
> much better
> foundation in reality in terms of justifiable limits than the 
> commercial
> world has.  I realize that commercial EMC/safety is in a period of
> transition, but for now I am quite content to be where I am 
> and simply sit
> back and watch the chaos and confusion...
> 

[snippo]

Oh, it just could be a case of embracing the devil that you know. <grin>

Just never sit back so far that you can't reach the pizza & beer.

Regards,

Ed

:-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-)
Ed  Price
[email protected]
Electromagnetic Compatibility Lab
Cubic Defense Systems
San Diego, CA.  USA
858-505-2780 (Voice)
858-505-1583 (Fax)
Military & Avionics EMC Services Is Our Specialty
Shake-Bake-Shock - Metrology - Reliability Analysis
:-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-)

-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Jim Bacher:              [email protected]
     Michael Garretson:        [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]

Reply via email to