Scott - We maintain a similar system. That is with
stuff scattered at different points in the company.

I (and you and I think many others) belive that WHERE
access to the documentation is irrelevant. What really counts
is GETTING the documentation to the person that requests it.



-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Douglas [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2000 10:19 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Technical Documentation




I guess I want to toss my 2 cents in here. I am probably going to be found
out in left field but here's what I do with all this stuff. I keep a 3 ring
binder where I store copies of all of the safety agency certifications and
notices of compliance from the EMC test house. I also keep a copy of the
Declaration of Conformity in the book. I keep one copy of this binder in our
UK office, one copy here in my office and one copy here in Document Control
(here being our US factory). In addition to the binders, I keep one file
cabinet in Document Control where I store all safety and EMC test records. I
am now adding copies of component proofs to this file cabinet. I do not
store schematics, fabrication or assembly drawings. Neither do I store user
manuals or reference manuals. Tech Pubs and Drafting store all these
documents and drawings.

Should the need arise, anyone can ask our UK office for a document and that
request will be passed on to me. If that request ever comes in, I will go to
Document Control and arrange  to collect the necessary paperwork. I am
certainly not going to create a file of duplicate documents that I have to
update on an every day basis. So it would seem that my TCF or whatever else
you want to call it is actually scattered all over our factory, each
function keeping their own records. About the only thing I did to these
other document storage processes was to add the 10 storage requirement to
their ISO 9001 procedures. One other thing I did was to insert myself in the
ECO process such that I sign off on every change order to a tested and
released product. That way, I won't miss anything.

So far, it seems to be working with minimal fuss. The few requests I have
had were from non-European countries for test records, specifically from
South Africa, Australia and Russia. I am sure somebody will tell me I am way
out there and really non-compliant. But since I test and certify to product
specific (ITE) standards, I do not need to keep "TCF's or whatever else" at
a test house / notified / competent body. Therefore, I will not keep such a
file here either. I will deliver whatever documents to whomever requests, it
may take a few days, but I will deliver. If that is not in keeping with the
spirit and intent, then somebody better lock me up.


Scott
[email protected]
ECRM Incorporated
Tewksbury, MA  USA




-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Jim Bacher:              [email protected]
     Michael Garretson:        [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]


-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Jim Bacher:              [email protected]
     Michael Garretson:        [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]

Reply via email to