I read in !emc-pstc that [email protected] wrote (in <20011010220435.1219 [email protected]>) about 'UL - marking', on Wed, 10 Oct 2001: >Can we get any problems with UL during thee follow-up process ? I ask because >I >have a feeling that the name of the manufacturer should be present on the >power >supply unit.
While you may get an answer here (it is quite likely to be the less than helpful 'probably'), there is no reason why you should not simply ask UL. This is quite a common problem these days, and whatever UL decided in the past, they may decide differently now. They also quite like to be asked questions in advance of a submission, rather than have to deal with a refusal for a purely formal violation such as incorrect labelling. -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Eat mink and be dreary! ------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: [email protected] with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Michael Garretson: [email protected] Dave Heald [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected] Jim Bacher: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old messages are imported into the new server.
