Chris:
Thanks for your intelligent reply and a little needed humor too. In my days
of paid employment CSA electrical safety was where it was at. Nowdays I
think they need Compliance Engineers to be able to determine which standard
applies.  I guess there could be two approaches, generic immunity or the way
it is now. Either way, it seems to present as many problems.

By the way, I'll endorse your cheques with CE, but only from my basement.

Regards,


Ralph Cameron

----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Chileshe" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 12:37 PM
Subject: RE: CE Mark


>
> Hi Ralph,
>
> The CE mark is not exclusive to EMC. Indeed, it refers to compliance with
> all directives relevant to the product, so a teddy bear will be CE marked
if
> it meets the requirements of the toy directive and all relevant safety
directives.
>
> Pressure vessels will have to meet the requirements of the pressure
directive
> and so on, and if any product crosses boundaries, it has to meet all the
applicable
> directives.
>
> However, the CE mark is a declaration of conformity and you can self
certify.
> This means I can disappear into my garage for a few weeks and emerge with
> a CE marked product - and it would be perfectly legal - as long as the
declaration
> is true i.e. I have done what needs to be done to prove compliance, and
one way
> to do this would be to test to applicable harmonised standards. Validity
of self
> certification may change in due course but at the moment, that is how it
is.
>
> I like Chris Maxwell's spin on the meaning of CE, and it would be true if
> every firm made a distinction between the compliance engineer and the
> designer. In all the companies I have worked for - we do it all i.e. the
designer
> designs to spec, takes the product through type approval tests, then
through
> precompliance and then through full compliance. So the electronics
designers
> are responsible for meeting all the applicable directives (EMC, electrical
safety)
> and functional type approval and they do so by product proving and EMC
testing
> the product themselves - to the applicable standard. They are also
responsible for
> the technical documentation for the electrical aspects of the product. The
> mechanical engineers and hydraulics engineers do likewise and when it's
all done,
> the fall guy (engineering director) puts his signature on the declaration
of conformity.
> What this means is that if the declaration should subsequently be proven
false, he
> is the one who goes to the gallows.
>
> Wait a minute! I used to think everyone worked that way, but I get the
feeling
> I may be doing too much! That does it! I am off to see the payroll people
soon
> after sending this e-mail and hopefully will emerge with a CE marked
cheque -
> or CE marked letter of dismissal!! You can never be too sure with these
> accounts people.
>
> Regards y'all
>
> - Chris Chileshe
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ralph Cameron [SMTP:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 4:57 PM
> To: Chris Chileshe; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: CE Mark
>
> I think its fair to state that CE also equates to designed in level of
> immunity to electromagnetic interference, i.e.  reduced sensitivity or
> susceptibility.  In my view , a highly desireable because it prevents a
lot
> of what's out there from coming in and conversely a lot of what's inside
> from coming out.
>
> It's a compromise but better than nothing.
>
> Ralph cameron
> EMC Consulting and Suppression of Consumer Electronics
> (after sale)
>
> << snip >>
>
> _____________________________________________________________________
> This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
> delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
> information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
> Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
>
> -------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
> Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
>
> Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
>
> To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
>      [email protected]
> with the single line:
>      unsubscribe emc-pstc
>
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
>      Michael Garretson:        [email protected]
>      Dave Heald                [email protected]
>
> For policy questions, send mail to:
>      Richard Nute:           [email protected]
>      Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
>
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
>     No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old
messages are imported into the new server.
>


-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Michael Garretson:        [email protected]
     Dave Heald                [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]
     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old 
messages are imported into the new server.

Reply via email to