<EDFA411E5E4AD2118D6F00A0C99E4BAC0386AD75@FLBOCEXU02>, [email protected] wrote: >You said that placing on >the market took place when the products were transferred from the >manufacturing plant to the warehouse even if both locations were owned by >the same company. I had said that the warehouse could not be under the same >control.
I believe that you are right. >I went back to review the "Guide to the implementation of >directives based on the New Approach and the Global Approach" and found that >you are correct. Clause 2.3.1 defines "placing on the market" and footnote >31 says "the distribution chain can also be the commercial chain of the >manufacturer." Remember that these Guidelines are NOT definitive of the law. In this case, a manufacturer could very easily evade requirements by shipping product around between his own warehouses. I don't believe that would withstand a legal challenge. -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. Phone +44 (0)1268 747839 Fax +44 (0)1268 777124. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Why not call a vertically- applied manulo-pedally-operated quasi-planar chernozem-penetrating and excavating implement a SPADE? ------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: [email protected] with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Michael Garretson: [email protected] Dave Heald [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected] Jim Bacher: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.rcic.com/ click on "Virtual Conference Hall,"
