No, Perry, I have not had problems, even with ungrounded thieving, as long
as the copper islands were very small compared to a wavelength at the
frequency of concern. Under that condition, no significant current flows in
them and they do not contribute to further radiated emissions.

What frequency to be concerned about, now, that can trip you up; my 350 MHz
signal was the seventh harmonic of a 50 MHz clock. If you have (say) a 1.5
GHz clock, then you can see thieving will have to be very small indeed.

Incidentally, you have to put thieving on a ground plane too, but in THAT
case it takes the form of holes of some kind  If you are not careful, the
board manufacturer will make them SLOTS, and that can be a very bad thing,
even for small traces, when a slot is located over a high-frequency clock.
Not only will it radiate, it will do bad things to the wave form.


Cortland


====================== Original Message Follows ====================

 >> Date:  17-Jan-01 08:27:15  MsgID: 1077-21697  ToID: 72146,373
From:  "Perry Qu" >INTERNET:[email protected]
Subj:  Re: [Fwd: [SI-LIST] : Copper balance]
Chrg:  $0.00   Imp: Norm   Sens: Std    Receipt: No    Parts: 1

List-Post: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 11:22:09 -0500
From: "Perry Qu" <[email protected]>
Organization: Alcatel CID
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [SI-LIST] : Copper balance]
 
Hi! Cortland:

Thanks for your comments. In your experience, does  the size/spacing of the
copper dots or islands matter as long as their dimension is much smaller
than the wavelength for the highest possible frequency on the card ? Any
special considerations other than that ?

Regards

Perry

-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Jim Bacher:              [email protected]
     Michael Garretson:        [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]

Reply via email to