Hi!

We are looking for some advice on copper thieving on the PCB. The
concern is  the EMC impact of the floating copper.  Anyone is willing to
share his/her experience on the best configuration for high percentage
of copper coverage and low EMI at the same time ? Refer to the post to
SI list by my colleague Dorin on this issue.

Any advice on this will be greatly appreciated.

Regards

Perry Qu

--- Begin Message ---
Hi,

I am working now on the copper balance issue we have on our PCBs. On the
outer layer beneath the converter a copper surface is required (E
shielding) which generates the copper balance issue on that particular
layer and also throughout the stack up. Thus, the unpopulated copper
space is filled with square or circle floating copper surfaces separated
in-between. These squares are overlapping throughout the stack up. The
question: what is  the best copper geometry, its dimension and the
spacing between these geometries ?. Copper balance requires as much
copper as possible but EMC wants no floating copper and very weak
coupling between noisy areas such as converter and any functional
digital area.

Your help is really appreciated,
Dorin


**** To unsubscribe from si-list or si-list-digest: send e-mail to
[email protected]. In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE
si-list or UNSUBSCRIBE si-list-digest, for more help, put HELP.
si-list archives are accessible at  http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
****


--- End Message ---

<<attachment: perry.qu.vcf>>

Reply via email to