Ralph,
Is the EMCAB-1 to which you refer the one issued by Industry Canada, If so, it is EMCAB-1 Issue 3 and can be downloaded (in PDF) for free at: http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/SSG/sf01004e.html Please note that as this document's title (EMC Advisory Bulletin) suggests, this document is only an advisory bulletin and, as such, contains no requirements. Its focus relates to immunity in Canada. Best regards, Ron Pickard [email protected] "Ralph Cameron" To: "Price, Ed" <[email protected]>, "EMC-PCST \(E-mail\)" <[email protected] <[email protected]> et> cc: Sent by: Subject: Re: Consumer Electronics Compatibility owner-emc-pst [email protected] 01/16/01 03:09 PM Please respond to "Ralph Cameron" Sorry, the attachment called EMCAB-1, Elecrtomagnetic Compatibility Bulletin -1 is 230K of PDF format so it exceeds the server limit. If any one is interested i will send it to you separately. Ralph Cameron ----- Original Message ----- From: "Price, Ed" <[email protected]> To: "EMC-PCST (E-mail)" <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 10:02 AM Subject: Consumer Electronics Compatibility > > Ralph: > > Would you provide a little more detail about the <30MHz Consumer Electronics > compatibility problems that you have been addressing? Are you finding that > the path is a direct galvanic connection, or is the problem caused primarily > by radiation of energy off of the power lines? What are the most common > emitting devices, and what types of devices are the most numerous victims? > And of course, what's usually the best solution? > > Thanks, > > Ed > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ralph Cameron [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 7:57 PM > To: Ken Javor; dan kwok > Cc: EMC-PCST (E-mail) > Subject: Re: Site Correlation > > > > No, your message is clear, what I am saying is that the emissions below > 30Mhz cause the majority of the interference problems to consumer > electronics and that's not being addressed. > > Ralph Cameron > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ken Javor" <[email protected]> > To: "Ralph Cameron" <[email protected]>; "dan kwok" <[email protected]> > Cc: "EMC-PCST (E-mail)" <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 10:34 PM > Subject: Re: Site Correlation > > > > I must have been unclear in my previous message. The purpose of > controlling > > cable cm CE is to control the resultant cable-induced RE, which are > > controlled to protect tunable antenna-connected radio receivers, period. > > There was never any other purpose for controlling CE or RE. > > > > Ken Javor > > Ed Price > [email protected] > Electromagnetic Compatibility Lab > Cubic Defense Systems > San Diego, CA. USA > 858-505-2780 (Voice) > 858-505-1583 (Fax) > Military & Avionics EMC Services Is Our Specialty > Shake-Bake-Shock - Metrology - Reliability Analysis > > ------------------------------------------- > This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety > Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. > > To cancel your subscription, send mail to: > [email protected] > with the single line: > unsubscribe emc-pstc > > For help, send mail to the list administrators: > Jim Bacher: [email protected] > Michael Garretson: [email protected] > > For policy questions, send mail to: > Richard Nute: [email protected] > > > > ------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to: [email protected] with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Jim Bacher: [email protected] Michael Garretson: [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected] ------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to: [email protected] with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Jim Bacher: [email protected] Michael Garretson: [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected]
