Ralph:

Would you provide a little more detail about the <30MHz Consumer Electronics
compatibility problems that you have been addressing? Are you finding that
the path is a direct galvanic connection, or is the problem caused primarily
by radiation of energy off of the power lines? What are the most common
emitting devices, and what types of devices are the most numerous victims?
And of course, what's usually the best solution?

Thanks,

Ed



-----Original Message-----
From: Ralph Cameron [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 7:57 PM
To: Ken Javor; dan kwok
Cc: EMC-PCST (E-mail)
Subject: Re: Site Correlation



No, your message is clear, what I am saying is that the emissions below
30Mhz cause the majority of the interference problems to consumer
electronics and that's not being addressed.

Ralph Cameron

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ken Javor" <[email protected]>
To: "Ralph Cameron" <[email protected]>; "dan kwok" <[email protected]>
Cc: "EMC-PCST (E-mail)" <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 10:34 PM
Subject: Re: Site Correlation


> I must have been unclear in my previous message.  The purpose of
controlling
> cable cm CE is to control the resultant cable-induced RE, which are
> controlled to protect tunable antenna-connected radio receivers, period.
> There was never any other purpose for controlling CE or RE.
>
> Ken Javor

Ed  Price
[email protected]
Electromagnetic Compatibility Lab
Cubic Defense Systems
San Diego, CA.  USA
858-505-2780 (Voice)
858-505-1583 (Fax)
Military & Avionics EMC Services Is Our Specialty
Shake-Bake-Shock - Metrology - Reliability Analysis

-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Jim Bacher:              [email protected]
     Michael Garretson:        [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]

Reply via email to