"John Woodgate" wrote: > > I would be suspicious of that; it is a 'near-field' scenario, which > means that the emission field strengths are complex and impossible to > calculate. The Class B limits are related to a 10 m separation of source > and potential victim, and that implies far-field conditions for > emissions above about 5 MHz.
That's true, but weren't the early measurements for Class B done at 3 meters? - Doug McKean ------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Michael Garretson: pstc_ad...@garretson.org Dave Heald davehe...@mediaone.net For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old messages are imported into the new server.
