All,
Just last night, I was re-reading the procedures for
Verification (e.g. for Class A ITE) and Declaration of Conformity
(e.g. for Class B ITE.)
For products subject to Certification, refer to 47CFR2.938,
Retention of Records.
For products subject to Verification, refer to 47CFRF2.955,
Retention of Records.
For products subject to the Declaration of Conformity procedure,
refer to 47CRF2.1075, Retention of Records.
(To download, go to:
http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/index.html#page1
In the search terms field, type:
"47CFR2" AND "Retention"
This will produce all three sections above, Part 2 in its entirety,
and 47CRF2 Subpart J--Equipment Authorization Procedures,
which defines the three procedures.
Regards,
Dan
> From: [email protected]
> To: "emc-pstc \(E-mail\)" <[email protected]>
> Subject: SV: EMC test report
> Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 19:37:12 +0200
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
> Importance: Normal
> X-Resent-To: Multiple Recipients <[email protected]>
> X-Listname: emc-pstc
> X-Info: Help requests to [email protected]
> X-Info: [Un]Subscribe requests to [email protected]
> X-Moderator-Address: [email protected]
>
>
> I don't know what FCC require, but this is a general proposal for a test
> report:
>
> 1. SCOPE OF WORK
> 2. TEST LABORATORY
> 3. TEST PERIOD
> 4. ATTENDING REPRESENTATIVES
> 5. EQUIPMENT UNDER TEST
> 5.1 Equipment submitted for tests (incl. EUT description, manufacturer,
> serial number, SW and HW versions, etc)
> 5.2 Test configuration (EUT test set-up, cabling, etc)
> 5.3 Modes of operation
> 5.4 Modifications during testing
> 6 EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE DURING THE TESTS
> 6.1 Function testing
> 6.2 Performance monitoring
> 6.3 Criteria of acceptance
> 7. TESTS (incl. procedure, plots, pictures, result)
> 8. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS
> 9. TEST FACILITIES AND INSTRUMENTS
>
> Best regards
> Amund
>
>
> -----Opprinnelig melding-----
> Fra: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]]På vegne av Mike Cantwell
> Sendt: 25. april 2002 16:21
> Til: emc-pstc (E-mail)
> Emne: RE: EMC test report
>
>
>
> Section 10 of ANSI C63.4 covers what must be in a test report. It's
> important to have an accurate description of what was tested, including
> photographs. The intent is that the report should be complete enough to
> reproduce the test a year from now. Sounds simple... but it's not.
>
> Mike
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 6:18 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: EMC test report
>
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> Does FCC require that all that information be in the final report.
> Such as Product Manufacturer, Table of Contents, Equipment Units Tested,
> Equipment and Cable Configuration, List of Test Equipment( calibration
> data), Location of Test Site, Measurement Procedures, Reporting Measurement
> Data, Summary of Results...
> The reason I ask is that it states that "Digital devices ..are to be
> measured for compliance using the following procedure..." it doesn't say
> that it needs to be in the final summary.
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Cecil
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
> Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
>
> Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
>
> To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
> [email protected]
> with the single line:
> unsubscribe emc-pstc
>
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> Ron Pickard: [email protected]
> Dave Heald: [email protected]
>
> For policy questions, send mail to:
> Richard Nute: [email protected]
> Jim Bacher: [email protected]
>
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
> http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
> Click on "browse" and then "emc-pstc mailing list"
>
> -------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
> Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
>
> Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
>
> To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
> [email protected]
> with the single line:
> unsubscribe emc-pstc
>
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> Ron Pickard: [email protected]
> Dave Heald: [email protected]
>
> For policy questions, send mail to:
> Richard Nute: [email protected]
> Jim Bacher: [email protected]
>
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
> http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
> Click on "browse" and then "emc-pstc mailing list"
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
> Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
>
> Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
>
> To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
> [email protected]
> with the single line:
> unsubscribe emc-pstc
>
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> Ron Pickard: [email protected]
> Dave Heald: [email protected]
>
> For policy questions, send mail to:
> Richard Nute: [email protected]
> Jim Bacher: [email protected]
>
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
> http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
> Click on "browse" and then "emc-pstc mailing list"
-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
[email protected]
with the single line:
unsubscribe emc-pstc
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Ron Pickard: [email protected]
Dave Heald: [email protected]
For policy questions, send mail to:
Richard Nute: [email protected]
Jim Bacher: [email protected]
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on "browse" and then "emc-pstc mailing list"
