As always Rich provides excellent technical information .

While a different standard was originally referenced in this thread, 
I'd like to consider for a moment Chris Maxwell's question 
 "...there should be some minimum distance... on an inner layer of the
board"L
The 950-based standards have guidelines in this regard.

In section 2.9.6 'Enclosed or Sealed Parts' 
"For components or sub-assemblies which are enclosed or hermetically
sealed against ingress of dirt or moisture, and which satisfy the following 
compliance requirements, the minimum internal CREEPAGE DISTANCES and
CLEARANCES can be the values for Pollution Degree 1."

The paragraph that follows states, "Compliance is checked by inspection,
measurement and by subjecting the component or sub-assembly to the thermal
cycling test of 2.9.5" That section was developed for printed circuit
boards.
The samples spend a month going through thermal cycling 0-100C.

If the printed circuit fab was of low quality, the test would uncover
the development of voids due to layer separation where there could
be subsequent arcing then tracking.

John A. Juhasz

GE Interlogix
Fiber Options Div.
Bohemia, NY 


-----Original Message-----
From: Rich Nute [mailto:ri...@sdd.hp.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 12:12 PM
To: chris.maxw...@nettest.com
Cc: richard.pa...@exgate.tek.com; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: Creepage on PCB Internal Layers






Hi Chris:


> To me, it's sort of funny in that it just says that the Creepage and 
> Clearance distances do not apply on inner layers of void free PCBs.   
> That's nice; but I can't find where a distance is specified.  I mean, I 
> would think that there should be some minimum distance between an AC line 
> and a 5V SELV line on an inner layer of the board!!!!

To answer this comment, we need to look at what 
a creepage is and its role in the scheme of the
product.

Almost all product constructions employ solid 
and air insulations, both in parallel and in
series, between conductors.  We call solid 
insulation "solid insulation."  We call air
insulation "clearance."

We call the interface between solid insulation
and air insulation "creepage."

Note that solid insulation and air insulation
are truly electrical insulations.

Creepage is NOT an insulation.

Creepage is not a material. It is simply a 
surface at which solid and air insulations 
meet.

The surface of solid insulation is subject
to deposition of airborne "pollution."  
Typical products provide little or no control 
of airborne materials to prevent deposition 
of the "polluting" material onto the surface 
of a solid insulating material.

Polluting material is a solid, uncontrolled 
(i.e., not a known insulating) material in 
parallel with the solid (and air) insulations.  
The polluting material bridges the solid 
insulation, and therefore could jeopardize 
the safety function provided by the solid 
insulation.

When sufficient polluting material accumulates
on the surface of the solid insulation, the
voltage across the insulator and the pollution
causes micro-arcs in the pollution.  These
micro-arcs are high temperature, and cause 
thermal decomposition of the surface of the 
solid insulation.  When organic materials 
decompose, they free up the carbon atoms,
leaving a tiny carbon resistor on the surface
of the solid insulation.   

Each tiny carbon resistor is in parallel with
the adjacent solid insulation beneath the
surface of the solid insulation.  So the tiny
carbon resistor is shorting out a small part
of the surface of the solid insulation.

This phenomenon is known as "treeing" due to
the tracking pattern of the carbon path on the 
solid insulation surface.  

To account for the effect of pollutants on
the surface of organic solid insulations, we
require the creepage distance to be larger
than the air distance (clearance).  Because 
some materials are more resistant to tracking 
across the surface, the creepage distance is 
a function of the "relative tracking index" 
characteristic of the insulation.

Where a solid insulation is not subject to
pollution, there is no requirement for a
creepage distance.  Many standards specify 
that a hermetically sealed assembly is not
subject to creepage distance requirements.

Likewise, the inner layer of a multi-layer
printed wiring board is not subject to 
pollution and therefore is not subject to
creepage distance requirements.


Best regards,
Rich




-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Ron Pickard:              emc-p...@hypercom.com
     Dave Heald:               davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           ri...@ieee.org
     Jim Bacher:             j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
    Click on "browse" and then "emc-pstc mailing list"

-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Ron Pickard:              emc-p...@hypercom.com
     Dave Heald:               davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           ri...@ieee.org
     Jim Bacher:             j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
    Click on "browse" and then "emc-pstc mailing list"

Reply via email to