Not necessarily, you may want to "cost reduce" the product in the future
and may need the 'A' to 'B'
overhead.
Bob Heller
3M Product Safety, 76-1-01
St. Paul, MN 55107-1208
Tel: 651- 778-6336
Fax: 651-778-6252
=====================================================================================
"John Shinn"
<john.shinn@sanmin To: "'Gary McInturff'"
<[email protected]>
a-sci.com> [email protected]
"'Pierre SELVA'"
<[email protected]>
07/29/2002 09:22 "'Forum Safety-emc'"
<[email protected]>
AM cc: (bcc: Robert E.
Heller/US-Corporate/3M/US)
Please respond to Subject: RE: FCC and
Professional Scanner : Verification or certification
"John Shinn"
Obviously there is considerable disagreement between myself and what
appears
to be the
rest of the group. The positions regarding the consideration of the
scanner
as a Class A
device were well thought out. I will bow to the consenses of the group
However, even if the scanner were intended only for an Industrial /
commercial market,
and it could meet the Class B limits, wouldn't it be better to issue a DoC
in order to
open up more markets for the device?
John
-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
[email protected]
with the single line:
unsubscribe emc-pstc
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Ron Pickard: [email protected]
Dave Heald: [email protected]
For policy questions, send mail to:
Richard Nute: [email protected]
Jim Bacher: [email protected]
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on "browse" and then "emc-pstc mailing list"
